Home > Gun Control: Piers Morgan Wants To Eviscerate The 2nd Amendment
Print

Gun Control: Piers Morgan Wants To Eviscerate The 2nd Amendment

December 14th, 2012

Melissa Melton:  Michael Moore isn’t the only media figurehead openly calling for stricter gun control on the social media site Twitter today.

Not only does Piers Morgan apparently want to straight up take away people’s guns, but he has a multi-step plan for exactly how America should be disarmed.

The host of CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight went on an anti-gun Tweet rant following the mass shooting in a Connecticut school that left 28 people, including 20 children, dead earlier this morning.

Have you ever wondered how billionaires continue to get RICHER, while the rest of the world is struggling?


"I study billionaires for a living. To be more specific, I study how these investors generate such huge and consistent profits in the stock markets -- year-in and year-out."

CLICK HERE to get your Free E-Book, “The Little Black Book Of Billionaires Secrets”

“Only way forward for America is a national gun policy, same (much tougher) laws for everyone. No assault weapons for civilians, period,” Morgan wrote, before following it up by laying out a plan to disarm the American public. Morgan called for a “minimum 3 references” and “detailed vetting over 6-8 weeks.” He also claimed that no one under 25 should have a gun, and neither should “ANYONE with ANY mental health history whatsoever.” Morgan finishes by stating that “No American needs more than one firearm at home to protect themselves under 2nd Amendment.”

photo

Morgan’s plan, while seemingly comprehensive, leaves many questions. If America were to “ban guns on anyone under 25,” then how would we have a military? Would we have to raise the age limit on joining the police force or becoming a soldier? Who is the person that Morgan suggests we get a reference from? Why would that make any difference? What are the guidelines for his “extensive social media checks”? What exactly constitutes a “mental health history”?

As Paul Joseph Watson reported, “Morgan is seemingly ignorant of the fact that the decision to ban handguns in Britain did nothing to lower gun crime. In the six years following the ban, gun crime more than doubled.” This isn’t the first fatal shooting Morgan has politicized to declare war on the 2nd Amendment; he previously cheered Bob Costas’ anti-gun sentiments following a professional football player’s murder-suicide and seized on the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting to fill his Twitter profile with pro-gun control mantras.

This isn’t the first time Morgan has advocated the trampling of people’s rights, either; evidence surfaced in 2009 that he was involved in a UK phone hacking scandal, publishing stories that were obtained through tapping phone lines when he worked for Rupert Murdoch in the 1990s.

Again, Connecticut is ranked 5th in the nation for gun laws, schools are already gun-free zones, and laws made to target gun crimes do nothing to stop criminals from getting guns and perpetrating those crimes if they so choose. The man who walked into a Connecticut elementary school and opened fire today certainly wasn’t concerned with whether or not he was following any laws.

When America declared its independence, the 2nd Amendment was instituted because British rule and its loyalists were trying to disarm patriot militias before the American revolution. That Amendment was instituted to keep this country free from tyrannical governments.

Is this irony lost on Morgan?

Alex Jones gave his own Twitter response to Morgan’s unconstitutional gun grabbing plan:

photo
This article is brought to you courtesy of Melissa Melton a writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.


Economy, Government



Tags: , , , , ,

Facebook Comments

Comments



  1. TexEd
    December 15th, 2012 at 17:54 | #1

    Well, OK, if all the criminals and those with histories of mental problems really and truly promise not to ever, ever violate a “No Gun Zone” sign or themselves, use a gun for a criminal purpose and if Piers will sign off on each as a “reference,” I’m in.

  2. Alan in Beaverdale
    December 15th, 2012 at 16:06 | #2

    What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts

  3. Ian Knox
    December 15th, 2012 at 07:26 | #3

    Christmas in Connecticut by Alex Jones – What father or mother can honestly feel that after the tragedy in Connecticut that responsible gun control is not required in America. If Alex Jones’ children, wife, brother, father or mother had been murdered, would he have the unmitigated gall to criticize those who advent gun control. Jones, you might as well have been the one to spill the blood. Your published unconsciounable mentality will just encourage those without moral convictions to follow in your bloody footsteps. I thank God that we live in a country where violence isn’t lobbied in the guise of “the right to bare arms” at the price of innocent victims.
    Our Canadian government must take a moral stand and show by example that we will not tolerate gun irresponsiblity and increase punishment for same with the most extreme letter of the law. We, as Canadians grieve for the countless Americans affected by this tragedy and pray that they feel the outpouring of love and goodwill that is sent to you.

  4. December 15th, 2012 at 02:01 | #4

    Piese morgan I live 7 miles from town 1 mile from my neighbors I need a gun to protect myself. Last year I was mowing and my dog was behind me. I called our Sheriff and it was three calls and hours later to show up. No proof! Tell me should I live in the country without a gun or should I be able to have a gun?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Copyright 2009-2013 MarketDailyNews.COM

LOG