Home > Gun Control: Charles Schumer Makes A Move In The Senate To Deny Veterans The Right To Own Firearms
Print

Gun Control: Charles Schumer Makes A Move In The Senate To Deny Veterans The Right To Own Firearms

December 3rd, 2012

Kurt Nimmo: Prior to the anti-Second Amendment commentary of Bob Costas and Kansas City sports writer Jason Whitlock (who compared the NRA to the KKK), notorious gun-grabber Charles Schumer made a move in the Senate to deny veterans the right to own firearms.

photo
Senator Chuck Schumer. Photo: David Shankbone.

Have you ever wondered how billionaires continue to get RICHER, while the rest of the world is struggling?


"I study billionaires for a living. To be more specific, I study how these investors generate such huge and consistent profits in the stock markets -- year-in and year-out."

CLICK HERE to get your Free E-Book, “The Little Black Book Of Billionaires Secrets”

Schumer raised a stink last week after Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., prepared to amend a $631 billion defense bill and prevent the Veterans Affairs Department from adding the names of veterans the government designates as mentally incompetent and unable to handle their finances into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The system effectively shuts down their Second Amendment right to own a firearm.

“I love our veterans, I vote for them all the time. They defend us,” Schumer said. “If you are a veteran or not and you have been judged to be mentally infirm, you should not have a gun.”

Dan Gross, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said that if the government deems you “unable to handle your own affairs, that’s likely to constitute a high percentage of people who are dangerously mentally ill.”

For Gross, Schumer and the VA, “infirm” not only applies to people who suffer from schizophrenia, but also from post-traumatic stress disorder. In recent years, the gun-grabbers have used PTSD as an excuse to deny gun rights to veterans.

[Related: CNN Anchor Piers Morgan Calls For Increased Gun Control and Said The 2nd Amendment Was Outdated]

“PTSD is only the beginning,” we warned in June. “There are any number of medical conditions the government will ultimately cite in order to restrict gun ownership.”

“We consider it an abject tragedy that so many of our veterans return home, after risking life and limb to defend our freedom, only to be stripped of their Second Amendment rights because they need help managing their compensation,” Chris Cox of the NRA said last year.

“We want to remove these stigmas for mental health treatment. It’s a combat injury,” said Tom Tarantino, chief policy officer for Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, in response to the move by Sen. Schumer. “They wouldn’t be doing this if you were missing your right hand, so they shouldn’t be doing it if you’re seeking treatment for post-traumatic-stress-disorder or traumatic brain injury.”

In June, we wrote about how Obamacare will ultimately centralize medical records and “allow the FBI to troll a list of Americans for ailments such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder to deny them their gun rights, in the same way that the Veterans Administration has already denied more than 150,000 veterans their right to bear arms,” according to Gun Owners of America.

The corporate media is cranking up the anti-gun propaganda machine in the wake of the tragic murder-suicide of NFL linebacker Jovan Belcher.

Ashley Fantz, writing for the military psy op CNN, quotes Dr. Scott Eliason who says that a “middle-aged man who is recently separated or facing pending estrangement from an intimate partner and who is depressed and has access to firearms” potentially poses a serious threat. In addition, “an older male who is the primary caregiver for a spouse who is ill or debilitated, where there is a recent onset of new illness in the male, depression and access to firearms” may commit murder.

[Related: Mystery Surrounding 1.2 Billion Rounds Of Ammo Solved]

Considering the government’s inevitable mission creep (especially in regard to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights) it is entirely possible “at risk” middle age non-veterans may also have their firearms ownership either denied or their firearms confiscated following the implementation of Obamacare and its sprawling database.

The antipathy of Democrats toward the right to own firearms is legendary and Obama now believes he has a mandate to attack the Constitution under the cover of Obamacare (as he previously attacked it under the mission to fight terrorism, as did his predecessor).

“The ObamaCare bill already contains language that will punish Americans who engage in unhealthy behavior by allowing insurers to charge them higher insurance premiums. (What constitutes an unhealthy lifestyle is, of course, to be defined by legislators.),” Gun Owners of America writes. “Don’t be surprised if an anti-gun nut like [noted gun-grabber and HHS boss Kathleen Sebelius] uses this line of thinking to impose ObamaCare policies which result in a back-door gun ban on any American who owns ‘dangerous’ firearms.”

This article is brought to you courtesy of Kurt Nimmo a writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.


Government



Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Facebook Comments

Comments



  1. JAS
    December 10th, 2012 at 18:36 | #1

    Never forget that the VA is a part of the fed gov and their records will altimately be accessable by FBI, CIA, DHS or any other dept that wants them.

  2. Craig
    December 8th, 2012 at 17:39 | #2

    Wow. Having read the 2nd Amendment, I didn’t see where should discriminate against different groups.Vets, elderly, union, police…I might have to read that again. Having spend my time in Iraq, who better to own a firearm than somebody who truly defended our freedom with one? We defended Schumers freedom also, we didn’t discriminate against anybody…

  3. Mike
    December 8th, 2012 at 10:12 | #3

    My question to Mr. Schumer is: who makes the judgement as to “mentally infirm/incompetent”??? I believe many a politician (to include Mr. Schumer of course) to be: infirm/incompetent. A warning to all that threaten the United States of America(foreign or Domestic), there are many God fearing/Law abiding veterans (L.E.O & Military)and we a watching! Remember the 2 ways to defend the Constitution: ballot box or ammo box (2nd Amendment doesn’t mention sporting purposes). Educate friends & family to make informed votes…better than 2nd choice.

  4. Ranger Mooney
    December 8th, 2012 at 10:03 | #4

    The phrase “unable to handle their own affairs and finances” applies to all the people like Schumer in the Congress. We really need to start enforcing and limiting the powers they are using.

  5. Stan
    December 5th, 2012 at 14:55 | #5

    I wonder if they ever stopped to consider that if, Heaven forbid, a foreign or domestic power were to attempt an armed coup in our Great Nation, who would be the ones fighting? It sure as hell wouldn’t be Mr Accountant or Mr Attorney III but the very ones they seek to emasculate. We would find each other, form units & lead a resistance.

    Nevermind that. Let’s just talk plain ol facts. Someone show me statistics on how many veterans commit crimes with a gun versus civilians that do the same.

  6. Niko
    December 4th, 2012 at 21:20 | #6

    Chuck Schumer is just another loudmouth (Ethnic Slur) from New York and a radical liberal….. My question to the learnard Senator is this “Show me just how many veterans with PTSD have committed crimes with guns” ??
    I think you will find the numbers do not warrent any intervention by Chuck or anyone else. The real reason is they know we took an oath ” To defend our country and the constitution against ALL enemies…. foreign and Domestic”….. and we will. Don’t mess with veterans.

  7. Dean Suber
    December 4th, 2012 at 18:22 | #7

    Charles Schumer and Bob Costas are in the same deal. They both must go. Neither one deals in facts.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Copyright 2009-2013 MarketDailyNews.COM

LOG